Retirement Calculator

4% Rule vs Your Sustainable Spending

The 4% rule is a famous shortcut. Your assumptions — horizon, return, inflation, and outside income — often imply a different sustainable spend. Compare them side by side.

What this comparison means

The classic 4% rule multiplies your portfolio by 4% and treats that as a first-year withdrawal (often then adjusted for inflation). It is a research-inspired rule of thumb — not a calculation that knows your retirement length, expected real return, or Social Security.

Sustainable spending on this page uses the same annuity-real solver as How Much Can I Spend in Retirement?: solve for a constant purchasing-power portfolio withdrawal through your plan-through age under the return and inflation you enter, then add optional outside income. That is still a fixed-assumption estimate — not Monte Carlo success and not a guarantee.

When the two disagree, the gap is the story. A long horizon with modest real returns can make 4% look aggressive; a shorter horizon or higher assumed real return can make 4% look conservative. Outside income raises both totals equally, so the gap is driven by the portfolio piece.

Where the 4% rule comes from (and where it stops)

Popular “4%” discussions trace to historical withdrawal studies on diversified portfolios over long retirements. Those studies answer a different question than “what does my spreadsheet say under these assumptions?” They also do not replace stress-testing against bad early markets — sequence risk can matter even when a fixed 4% looks fine on a smooth return path.

This page deliberately shows 3% and 5% as context. Rules of thumb are a range, not a commandment.

How the sustainable side is calculated

We call the planner’s Spending Capacity annuity-real path for the years from retirement to your plan-through age. Details live in Spending Capacity methodology. Markets are not randomized here; for that, use Monte Carlo or Historical with a candidate spend.

How this page differs from our other free tools

Important limitations

No taxes, no RMDs, no account location. Fixed returns are not real markets. Educational comparison only — not advice. Explore Jim & Susan’s sample plan or build a free plan to replace shortcuts with your accounts.

Frequently asked questions

Is the 4% rule wrong?

It is a useful rule of thumb from historical research on a specific portfolio and horizon — not a personalized plan. Your sustainable spending under different returns, horizons, and income can be higher or lower than 4%.

Which number should I use?

Treat both as educational estimates. Then stress-test a candidate spend with Monte Carlo or Historical tools. Neither the 4% rule nor annuity-real capacity is a safe-withdrawal guarantee.

Does this use the same math as How Much Can I Spend?

Yes for the “sustainable” side: the annuity-real Spending Capacity solver. This page’s job is to contrast that result with the classic 4% (and 3%/5%) rule of thumb.

Are taxes included?

No. Both views are pre-tax cash estimates. Account for taxes separately or in advice from a qualified professional.